| WASHINGTON 
(AP) -- As Congress moves to slash $40 billion in spending, no program will take 
a bigger hit than college loans, where almost $13 billion would be cut over five 
years.
 For 
students, the upshot is mixed. Excessive government payments to banks would be 
halted, freeing up some dollars for new grants, larger loan limits and reduced 
loan fees. But 
overall, the student loan program would endure the largest cut in its history, 
and most of the money would not be pumped back into education. Instead, under 
a plan the House approved Monday, the money would be counted only toward reducing 
the federal deficit. "At 
a time when the entire country believes we need to make higher education more 
affordable, Congress is trying to balance the budget on the backs of students," 
said Jasmine Harris, legislative director for the United States Student Association.
 School 
Loan Consolidation.com
 Reduce 
your monthly payments by up to 58%. 
There's no credit check or fees.
 click 
here
 Parents 
who take out loans on behalf of their students would pay higher interest rates. 
And other parts of the college package could indirectly drive up costs for students, 
if banks pass on new expenses or offer less attractive loans as their profit margin 
shrinks. "You 
don't want to say the news is all bad. It's a decidedly mixed bag," said Terry 
Hartle, senior vice president of the American Council on Education, the largest 
coalition of colleges and higher education groups in the nation. "But 
on balance, one comes to the conclusion that this is a sad step in the history 
of the student loan program," Hartle said. The 
$12.7 billion in college cuts are part of an effort, led by conservative Republican 
lawmakers, to show discipline with the public's money. But Democrats say GOP leaders 
only want to pay for tax cuts, all the while eroding the ability of parents to 
pay for college. The 
timing of Senate action was unclear. Colleges and university associations scrambled 
Monday, urging the Senate to reject the bill as the Congress tried to end its 
2005 work. Within 
higher education, the single biggest cut appears to be in the profits of lenders. Under 
current law, banks get to keep the excess money when the amounts that students 
pay in interest exceed the rate of return that the government has guaranteed. 
That would end. Lenders would have to refund the difference to the government, 
meaning billions of dollars. "We 
were able to reduce spending through changes in the way lenders operate," said 
Mike Enzi, R-Wyo., the chairman of the Senate education committee. "But at the 
same time, we shielded the direct impact to students, and actually increased student 
opportunities."
 School 
Loan Consolidation.com
 Reduce 
your monthly payments by up to 58%. 
There's no credit check or fees.
 click 
here
 The 
interest rate for parent loans would increase to a fixed rate of 8.5 percent in 
July. It is now a variable rate and had been set to move to a fixed rate of 7.9 
percent. Meanwhile, 
the interest on students loans would also move to a fixed rate of 6.8 percent 
in July, up from its current variable rate of 4.7 percent. But that change was 
already set to happen under law, and the deficit-reduction bill does not alter 
that plan. Student groups tend to support a fixed rate as a protection against 
unstable, rising interest rates. Loan 
limits would increase from $2,625 to $3,500 for first-year students, and from 
$3,500 to $4,500 for second-year students. The total borrowing limit allowed for 
undergraduates would remain at $23,000. Lawmakers aimed for a compromise of letting 
students borrow more at the start of college, reflecting current needs, without 
sanctioning a bigger overall debt. The 
bill would offer grants to poorer, high-achieving students in the first two years 
of college and older undergraduates studying math, science or high-demand foreign 
languages. John 
Boehner, R-Ohio, the chairman of the House education committee, said the bill 
"offers significant new benefits to students pursuing a college education." But 
critics said the size of those benefits doesn't come close to offsetting the cuts. Said 
Bob Shireman, director of The Institute for College Access and Success: "Overall, 
there will be less money out there for helping students pay for higher education. 
And it's not being returned to the system, except in some small ways."
 |